![]() ![]() On the one hand, some adhere closely to the Precautionary Principle. This is how I prefer to think about this: This is of utmost importance as we prepare for the AI revolution and the potential advent of superintelligent AI systems, ensuring that our civilization is sufficiently equipped to handle future challenges. This conversation should be grounded in empirical evidence, rigorous cost-benefit analyses, and a comprehensive understanding of potential risks and benefits. Such adversarial classification is not helpful for a productive discussion. ![]() The ongoing discourse surrounding AI safety and its potential for existential risks seems to have escalated into an intense polarization, with participants taking entrenched positions - "AI Doomers" versus "AI Denialists." ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |